When it comes to the dynamic landscape of finance, venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) have emerged as potent tools driving innovation and growth across various industries. 

Navigating the complex terrain of these investment strategies requires not only financial acumen but also a keen understanding of the legal intricacies that can significantly impact the success of ventures. 

A clear knowledge of the essential legal considerations for savvy investors aiming to make informed and strategic choices can be really helpful as well as keep the investors safe from the risks of investment.

Let’s explore the different facets of these two types of funds—VC and PE—and find out some legal must-knows for smart investing and reducing risks:

Venture Capital Vs Private Equity Funds

Before diving into the legal landscape, it’s crucial to understand the diverse nature of VC and PE funds. 

Venture capital funds typically invest in early-stage startups with high growth potential. On the other hand, private equity funds target more mature companies, aiming to drive operational improvements and increase profitability. 

Within these broad categories, there are various specialised funds, such as seed-stage funds, growth equity funds, and buyout funds, each catering to specific investment objectives.

Process Of Investing

The investment process in VC and PE involves rigorous due diligence, negotiations, and strategic decision-making. Legal considerations begin at the outset with the drafting and negotiation of term sheets, outlining key terms and conditions. 

The due diligence phase involves a comprehensive legal examination of the target company, assessing issues such as regulatory compliance, intellectual property rights, and contractual obligations. 

Negotiating definitive agreements, including shareholder agreements and purchase agreements, is a critical legal step in finalising the investment.

Associated Risks and Rewards

While VC and PE investments offer lucrative returns, they are not without risks. Legal due diligence is essential to identify potential legal pitfalls that could impact the success of an investment. 

Regulatory compliance, contractual obligations, and intellectual property-related concerns are among the key legal risks. 

On the flip side, successful navigation of these risks can lead to substantial rewards, including capital appreciation, significant equity stakes, and active involvement in the strategic direction of the invested companies.

Smart Investing With Legal Must-Knows

To ensure smart investing in VC and PE, investors must be well-versed in the legal considerations that underpin these transactions. Here are some crucial legal must-knows: 

  1. Regulatory Compliance: Understanding and navigating the regulatory landscape is paramount. Compliance with securities laws and other regulations governing investments is critical to avoid legal complications.
  2. Due Diligence: Thorough legal due diligence is non-negotiable. Investors must scrutinise contracts, regulatory filings, and potential legal disputes to assess the legal health of the target company. It is paramount to assess whether the investee companies have complied with the applicable laws related to their business operations.
  3. Contractual Agreements: Well-drafted and negotiated contractual agreements, including term sheets, shareholder agreements, and purchase agreements, are the bedrock of successful investments. Clarity on rights, obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms is vital.
  4. Exit Strategies: Developing and understanding exit strategies is integral to the investment process. Whether through an initial public offering (IPO) or a strategic acquisition, legal considerations play a pivotal role in successful exits.
  5. Intellectual Property Protection: Safeguarding intellectual property is crucial, especially in technology-driven industries. Investors must ensure that the target company has robust IP protection measures in place.

In the fast-paced world of investments, smart investing goes beyond financial calculations. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the legal landscape that surrounds these investments. 

From regulatory compliance to meticulous due diligence and well-crafted contractual agreements, legal considerations are integral to mitigating risks and unlocking the full potential of VC and PE investments. 

For investors aiming to navigate this intricate terrain, partnering with a reputable law firm with expertise in private equity and venture capital is not just a wise choice; it’s a strategic and legal risk-mitigating imperative. 

With a solid legal foundation, investors can embark on their journey towards smart and successful investments in the ever-evolving world of finance.

ttps://inc42.com/resources/the-investors-handbook-navigating-legal-landmines-in-private-equity-and-venture-capital/

Final Newsletter December 2023Download

A lot has been said about what is largely perceived to be a pro-growth Union Budget 2021 (Budget) and a lot more about the unprecedented viral precursor accompanying this fiscal outlook for the financial year 2021-22.

What has however remained unchanged from the pre-COVID era to the near term-after is the government’s continued push, albeit modest, for startups. The Government got to business by offering extended year-bound tax reliefs, unshackling the monetary limitations and reducing the compliance framework for small businesses.

In relation to tax reliefs, the Budget has sought to appease startups by extending the capital gains tax exemption for investments in an eligible startup company and extending the 100% tax rebate on profits, the “tax holiday”, in an eligible startup – both by an additional financial year. These tax exemptions should help attract investments and create tangible benefits for eligible startups.

In the regulatory sphere, beginning with the definitional change of the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) effective from July 2020, the redefinition spree has now been extended to small companies under Companies Act, 2013 (2013 Act), by increasing the eligibility limits of Rs 50 lakhs (paid up capital) and Rs 2 crores (turnover) to Rs 2 crores (paid up capital) and Rs 20 crores (turnover).

The result is the slashing of the compliance burden to almost half and lesser paperwork, in comparison with a private company, benefitting new startups seeking a more formalized legal structure. Regulatory flexibility has also been extended to the underperforming “one person companies'' under the 2013 Act, by removing conversion and turnover restrictions, reducing the residency limit for Indian citizens from 182 to 120 days and allowing Non-Resident Indian (NRI) participation.

The amendments to the 2013 Act were followed by the decriminalization of the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Act, 2008 and putting forth policy intent to introduce “Small LLP’s” and to permit LLPs to raise capital through the issue of non-convertible debentures. Given that one of the eligibility conditions for start-up recognition under the Startup India Action Plan is the incorporation as a private limited company, registered partnership firm or a limited liability partnership, these regulatory changes should result in more start-ups seeking to formalize their setup as well as promote domestic individual entrepreneurship.

The extension of incorporation rights for “one person companies” should incentivise offshore NRI led start-ups to set up shop in India.

Social impact driven financial inclusion is another theme of this Budget, which along with the complementary Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS) with a target corpus of rs 945 crores envisaging a staggered disbursement over a period of four years, beginning from April 1st 2021, to support an estimated 3,600 startups.

With the SISFS, the Government is seeking to prioritize startup culture in public welfare sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, social impact, waste management, water management, food processing and financial inclusion, amongst others.

Under the SISFS guidelines, only startups complying with conditions such as recognition by Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), incorporated not more than 2 years from date of application, having a market fit business idea with viable commercialization and scaling and early-stage inclination to the use of technology, are eligible.

These eligibility requirements may limit the number of actual beneficiaries of the scheme, leaving out the informal and yet to be tech-savvy startups, especially in the public welfare sectors. While the real-world impact of SISFS and its performance assessment are yet to be seen, the selection criteria set out in the guidelines seem to incorporate unbridled discretionary authority and bureaucratic involvement in the review and disbursement process.

Despite all the above-mentioned measures, the Budget has not been all sunshine and subsidies for startups.

The Budget has overlooked resolving some of the critical issues currently faced by startups, such as the difference in treatment between DPIIT recognized and non-recognized startups, loss of benefits such as the ‘Angel Tax’ exemption to non-recognized startups, delinking of ESOP exemption from requiring Inter-Ministerial Board approval exemption from surcharge on gains from sale of unlisted securities and exemption from GST under reverse-charge for start-ups, amongst others.

The government needs to address these issues and arrive at workable solutions which are practical and beneficial to the start-up ecosystem.

While this Budget may seem modest vis-à-vis startups, it is nonetheless a push in the right direction and we may see more Unicorns taking root and flourishing in the given growth-conducive environment.

Further, with the government pivoting interest to other areas of importance, it is plausible to see more Zebras gradually rising and contributing to a lasting socio-economic impact. Despite a global pandemic, 2020 alone saw 11 start-ups turning into Unicorns evincing the fact that the Indian start-up ecosystem has come a long way.

With the Budget incentives coupled with well-meaning policy initiatives, we can hope to see a further boost in numbers of the much-coveted Indian Unicorns and the existing Unicorns maturing to Decacorns.

Author Bio: Manu Varghese is a partner and head - general corporate and commercial practice at White and Brief, Advocates and Solicitors. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone.

Manu Varghese is a partner and head - general corporate and commercial practice at White and Brief, Advocates and Solicitors. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone. 

Subscribe to our

NEWSLETTER

Subscription Form