Supreme Court's decision to set aside India's first EVM-based election, focusing on legal, technical, and trust issues.
๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, did not authorize the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), rendering the election procedurally invalid without the necessary legal backing.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐: Questions about the reliability and accuracy of EVMs were raised, highlighting the need for thorough testing and validation.
๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐: There was a significant lack of transparency and trust among voters and political parties, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines and regulations to ensure electoral integrity.
The election was declared invalid, underscoring the necessity for a robust legal framework and safeguards when implementing new technologies in elections.
Post-decision, amendments to the Representation of the People Act were made to include EVMs, ensuring reliability and transparency through extensive trials and improvements.
๐๐ป๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐:
The importance of legal and procedural robustness in electoral processes was highlighted, with a focus on legal, technical, and trust safeguards.
Implementing technological advancements in elections must prioritize reliability and public confidence to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
This landmark decision by the Supreme Court reinforces the need for a comprehensive legal framework and transparent procedures to uphold the fairness and trustworthiness of elections.
To delve into the specifics, please review the information provided in the following link :
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7205931391375597568