Supreme Court's decision to set aside India's first EVM-based election, focusing on legal, technical, and trust issues.
𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, did not authorize the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), rendering the election procedurally invalid without the necessary legal backing.
𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀: Questions about the reliability and accuracy of EVMs were raised, highlighting the need for thorough testing and validation.
𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁: There was a significant lack of transparency and trust among voters and political parties, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines and regulations to ensure electoral integrity.
The election was declared invalid, underscoring the necessity for a robust legal framework and safeguards when implementing new technologies in elections.
Post-decision, amendments to the Representation of the People Act were made to include EVMs, ensuring reliability and transparency through extensive trials and improvements.
𝗘𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗘𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:
The importance of legal and procedural robustness in electoral processes was highlighted, with a focus on legal, technical, and trust safeguards.
Implementing technological advancements in elections must prioritize reliability and public confidence to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
This landmark decision by the Supreme Court reinforces the need for a comprehensive legal framework and transparent procedures to uphold the fairness and trustworthiness of elections.
To delve into the specifics, please review the information provided in the following link :
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7205931391375597568