Post the announcement of Union Budget 2025, the Finance and Revenue Secretary, Tuhin Kanta Pandey, said that the GST rate rationalisation is needed. Experts have been calling for this for 8 years and it has become the need of the hour now. Goods and Services Tax (GST) was implemented in 2017 and ever since its implementation, it has often been criticized for the complexities and compliance challenges it brought. The existence of multiple tax slabs such as 0%, 5%, 18% and 28% highlighted the complexities of the structure. The need for rate rationalization started making its way into politics and day-to-day discussions then itself, however, over the years, this has built up to now become a voice that can’t be unheard.
Recently, this erupted into a mainstream discussion even for the commoners when the GST council decided to levy GST on popcorn at different rates based on its preparation and packaging. The fact that salted popcorn attracted lesser GST and caramelized popcorn attracted more led to an outrage in the nation. This issue also highlighted the intricacies of the current GST framework. After this, the talks for rate rationalization were back in the market again and it became evident that we need it now more than ever.
India’s GST regime consists of multiple slab rates.
The different rates have led to complexities in tax administration and compliance. Frequent classification issues, coupled with varying interpretations across states, create litigation risks and operational inefficiencies. Moreover, the cascading effects on pricing and supply chains impact business planning and consumer behaviour. Hence, the need for rate rationalization arises from these issues.
To address rate rationalization demands, the GST Council formed a Group of Ministers (GoM) in December 2024. After the GoM submits its recommendations, the GST Council will consider potential changes. However, as the GoM is only advisory, the final decision rests with the GST Council, which has yet to discuss any rate revisions.
The GST Council, composed of central and state government representatives with differing economic priorities, often faces challenges in reaching unanimous agreements on rate changes. While a simplified tax structure offers many benefits, the GST has encountered obstacles in meeting its objectives, highlighting the need for rationalization. Let’s explore the complexities now.
Despite being implemented in 2017, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India has yet to achieve full stability. GST remains complex due to multiple tax slabs, leading to classification disputes, compliance challenges, and federal disagreements between the Centre and States over revenue sharing and rate rationalization. Rationalizing GST rates in India is the need of the hour as it offers an opportunity to simplify the tax system, improve compliance, and boost economic activity. However, achieving this goal requires balancing revenue needs, economic equity, and administrative feasibility.